|
|
Doesn't "THE NEW MILLENNIUM" sound like a grand happening? Well, for GDUC it certainly could be! Since the previous issue we've had quite a number of interesting things going on. I took part in the second "Dog Attack" Seminar at the GDB campus. At the previous seminar (sponsored by the Guide Dog Board), Joan Corbett offered to make the facilities at GDB available to a follow-up meeting on the sole issue of dog attacks. This meeting took place on Thursday, October 26, 2000. There were a number of interested parties in attendance. A representative from GDB, a representative of the San Rafael police department, both the San Rafael Animal Control department and the Animal Control Director's Association were represented. The Guide Dog Board was represented, and there was a healthy compliment of GDB people in attendance and, of course, GDUC was there too. There were a number of invitees who could not attend for various reasons. But, we did some really in depth discussing of the problems at hand. Since 1 out of every 3 guide dog handlers reports some kind of attack on their dogs and themselves as a team, everyone agrees that something has to be done. The consensus was that education of the public and enforcement of the laws already on the books must take a front seat position. The schools are working very hard to get and keep their graduates informed about the laws that protect them and to help grads deal with the attack situation if it happens to them. I still feel that legislation must play a part in improving things on the streets for us as teams. Sharper teeth need to be put into the laws we have and, of course, the teeth that are put into the laws have got to be used. Just a week previous to that meeting, there was a terrible incident in Merced, CA which involved a woman who was crossing a street, in a marked crosswalk, with her guide dog. She was hit and killed during her crossing. Her dog was not injured physically, but he has been retired as a guide. We have been watching this case very closely. The law enforcement people seem to be reluctant to charge drivers with violations of the "White Cane Law". So, we wrote and submitted a resolution to the CCB membership that would try to do something about that. The resolution that passed on the 5th of November is included in this issue in its entirety. I hand carried a copy of the resolution to the Merced District Attorney at the beginning of December. The Merced DA is still investigating the death of Cherie Moku, the handler who was killed. From the way he talks, it looks like charges just might be filed. We have to keep our fingers crossed. A number of criteria have to be met first, but the investigation continues to determine whether or not all of the elements of that crime exist. The Fall 2000 CCB convention took place in early November. As usual, GDUC held its meeting and luncheon on that Saturday, the 4th of November. It was a very interesting meeting. We did the usual housekeeping things such as treasurers report, took care of the minutes and things like that. We then elected three new members to GDUC's Board. A great big welcome to our new Vice President Ann Kysor, the new Treasurer Ken Metz and to Sheila Styron the new Director. They have come aboard just in time to be put to work in a big way. A heart-felt welcome to all of you and, a huge thank you to those who rotated off the Board this time. We are sorry to be losing Vice President Linda Flores, Treasurer Marion Fisher and Director Ethel Kirtley. We're going to miss you all. After our business meeting we had a discussion about an article that appeared in a San Diego newspaper about a dog training facility that is training protection dogs for victims of assault and then issuing them as ADA qualified service dogs with all access rights. The entire existing service animal community is upset about this. After a great deal of discussion the attending membership decided that GDUC should go forward to do as much as they can to halt the issuance of these protection dogs as Service Dogs. What we want to do is halt this practice, by court order if necessary, to give the DOJ time to revisit the language in the regulations and define, in more detail, what a Service Animal is. We set aside a portion of our treasury toward accomplishing this. We also decided that we should invite all of the Guide Dog Schools and Service Dog schools to join us in this effort. GDA offered their facility for a strategy meeting to plan how to proceed. We'll take them up on their very generous offer. Thank you GDA. I have attended several pedestrian safety meetings in the past few months. Two of them were in Los Angeles. As it turned out neither of them was focused on genuine pedestrian safety. They were more focused on beautification of the streets and put much emphasis on moving traffic. I keep trying, but I haven't found a key that will make the point that the safety of all members of the population have to be considered or none are safe. A good bit of this message has already been reported in the convention report, so I won't tell it all again. It is time again for you to submit your nominations for Instructor of the Year. If you want to nominate an instructor, let any member of the GDUC Board know who and what school they come from. Let us know either by phone, e-mail or by snail-mail. All of the contact information for your Board is at the end of this issue of "FORWARD". We need your nominations by the 15th of February. Guide Dog Day in Sacramento is on Wednesday, April 4th, 2001. The Guide Dog Board has selected a new Executive Officer. Pat Urena is retiring as of the end of February and Mr. Harry Thomas, formerly a member of the board and a current member of GDUC, was chosen by the board to succeed her. The board has several vacancies. I rotated off the board last summer and Mr. Thomas resigned from the board last spring leaving 2 positions needing to be filled. This coming summer there will come available 2 more positions. If any of you are interested in holding a seat on the State Board of Guide Dogs for the Blind, now is your chance to apply. If you contact the board office at (916) 263-8956 you can get all the information you need to get your application on the road. I'm going to wrap this message up so that "FORWARD" can be put to bed. Have a wonderful holiday season and give those hound dogs a big hug and a scratch from Brynn and me as we jump headlong into the next millennium. |
|
Bill Elliot in the United Kingdom gave us permission to reprint this from an e-mail post. Hello Everyone, Yesterday morning, on my walk home from work, the sun finally broke through the thick clouds and towards Liverpool I saw a rainbow, yes it is still raining after nearly three months, colleagues at work no longer greet one another with a cheery hello we just quack a greeting. But enough of that. The rainbow reminded me of an old friend, her name was Suki, she was my first GSD, she was black and tan with funny floppy ears, but she could make those ears prick when she wanted too, the sound of a biscuit being pulled from a pocket at two miles distance was enough to send those great antennae pointing skyward. On another day like yesterday we were out in the park, a gap in the raincloud brought down a sun beam and a rainbow appeared just a few yards ahead of us, Suki ran on ahead, I don't know if she was chasing that rainbow, but to my eyes she ran through to the end of the rainbow and stood there bathed in the beautiful light. That is how I thought of her yesterday, standing proud at the end of her rainbow. Our furkids are not around us for long; a few months later Suki went to the rainbow bridge, we don't know how long we have to share them, so give them a hug, and save a kind thought for all our friends who have lost someone dear to them in the past year. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Bill (Brett "Thirteen Years and not out" & Polly "Four Years and still playing mud pies." ) |
|
Thursday: I didn't write down the actual figures mentioned but we heard from the financial advisor that has been working with Cathy to set the Council up for the future. If one isn't an accountant one has a bit of difficulty keeping the details straight, but I think that knowing we are in pretty good hands is the most important point to have gathered from the CCB Board meeting. |
|
Friday: I cheated just a bit and talked to Rhonda King on the phone on Friday night to get GDUC registered with the Credentials Committee. I, Melita Waters, and Abby Vincent are delegate and alternate delegate respectively. So that was taken care of. The first order of business was to attend the Resolutions Committee meeting chaired by Jeff Thom. I presented for approval by the committee a resolution calling for CCB's and GDUC's demanding that the White Cane Law be more strictly enforced by local authorities. With very minor adjustments by Jeff, the resolution was presented to the plenary session on Sunday morning and passed without a hitch. The resolution appears in its entirety elsewhere in this issue. The second thing on the agenda was to get our tables set up and active. We had our regular table with our collar tags and lapel pins on display and for sale as well as having for distribution fliers and brochures about guide dogs. We also had for sale both print and braille copies of the "California Law Pertaining to Guide and Service Dogs". We were also there to collect dues and sign up new members. The second table sponsored by GDUC was a Tarot Card Reading table with readings for both animal and human. Madame Daivra was a great success. It was great fun and the readings were remarkably accurate. From there I went to the joint CAT and CCCLV session. Invited guests were an Architect/Manager of Urban Planning Design; Founder of Los Angeles Walks; and a representative of City of Los Angeles Pedestrian Advisory Committee; and a representative from Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. How to make the streets safer for pedestrians was the general topic. We were advised that LA is putting in four experimental Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS) around the area. These will have an added feature of giving verbalized information. This is much like the APS that was installed on Century Blvd. just before the 1999 ACB convention in Los Angeles. Discussion took place about the things that the access board is doing and the recommendations that they are on the threshold of presenting. As is usually the case, contributed ideas fly. Everyone has a potential solution and shares readily. The other thing I notice at each of these sorts of meetings is that the guest presenters probably learn more from us than the other way around. We do have, in our membership, some really "whiz-bang" experts. It's too bad we can't just set them loose on the problem, give them carte blanche and the pedestrian safety issue would truly be solved in short order. The first CCB General Session began as usual with all the traditional things and we were welcomed to Los Angeles by Mr. LA himself, our very own Mitch Pomerantz. The General Sessions are always so well reported in the Blind Californian that I will just give you the topics covered there. There was a BIA Panel discussion entitled "Making a Difference" moderated by Carmen Aplgren; Mitzi Friedlander, a favorite Talking Book Narrator spent about half an hour entertaining us; Debbie Cook, ACB's Information Access Committee Chair, talked about, what else, information access. Her presentation was followed by and the first general session was concluded with a report on the Committee on Domestic Violence and Hate Crime given by Dr. Jones. At the President's Dinner, GDUC was ably represented by Sheila Styron. I wasn't able to be there, so I didn't hear what she said, but I have no doubt that she did us proud. Friday Evening's General Session opened with a memorial to Sid Urena. The room was well filled for this memorial. CCB members are very aware of his loss. Manuel Urena was presented with a pin acknowledging his 50 years membership in the organization at this session; he was not able to attend the banquet. Rhonda King did the Credentials Committee report and roll call. President Skivers gave us her report which will be well covered in the BC. We were introduced to the new Deputy Director of the California Department of Rehabilitation, Linda Bardis. Then came the nominating committee report and elections. We elected Catherine Skivers to another term as President. Jeff Thom and Teddie Remhield were elected to First and Second Vice President, respectively. We elected Treasurer, Peter Pardini, and to positions on the Board of Directors, Ahmad Rahman, Barbara Rhodes and Barbara Kron. After elections the Friday evening session adjourned. |
|
Saturday: Elections came next. We elected our Vice President in the person of Ann Kysor, our Treasurer in the person of Ken Metz and one Board of Directors member in the person of Sheila Styron. Welcome to all of you. We hope you will enjoy being on GDUC's Board. There is much to do and we will all be very busy. Fund raising was discussed and everyone went away with the assignment to come up with a new and innovative fund raiser for GDUC. We discussed our Educational Brochures. While approval of the 20 Questions Project Brochures was not unanimous, the vast majority were approving and want to continue with this project. The membership wants to do a second mailing of the 20 Questions Project brochures. We will be doing this in the next few months. We heard a report on the dog attack seminars that have been held in the past few months, one in Albany and the second in San Rafael. The general consensus is that through education of law enforcement personnel, public information and legislation we can improve the lot of the guide dog user in this area. There was a report, that really was no report at all, on the Hotel/Motel Association Service Animal Task Force. The news was that things are currently on hold while funds are found to produce an educational video and ancillary materials for the Hotel/Motel industry employees' education. We also learned that some counties are now issuing the Service Animal Identification Tags. When we can get the information we need to do this, we will be sending a letter to each and every dog licensing agency in the state. This is really quite a daunting project. At this point we adjourned the business meeting and moved on to a discussion of the protection dog issue. Because of the importance of the issue, we asked the Guide Dog School representatives, who were scheduled to talk about their Custom Needs programs, if they would yield some of their time to the discussion at hand. They all agreed as it is as important to them as it is to all of us. There is a training facility in San Diego that is training dogs as protection dogs for victims of assault. The distressing factor here is that these dogs are being issued as Service Animals and this is validated in the ADA. The discussion was - What can we do about this to protect ourselves? What should we do? Where should we start? And above all, do we all agree that something needs to be done to stop the issuance of these dogs as Service Animals and how can we do this? The motion was made that GDUC should take the lead in doing everything we can to stop this practice and do all we can to get the DOJ to adjust the language in the ADA regulations to clarify what a Service Animal is and perhaps what training is required to be categorized as a Service Animal. A friendly amendment was offered to have GDUC designate $1,000 of our treasury to accomplish this end, and that we contact other interested parties and organizations with an eye toward having them join GDUC in this venture. The approval was unanimous. GDA offered their facilities for a meeting place to have a strategy session to get the project started. When we closed this discussion we heard from each school about their Custom Needs Programs. They shortened their presentations dramatically and agreed to take part in a similar program in the future. We still do want to know about their Custom Needs Programs. We then broke for the luncheon set up. Our luncheon speaker was arranged by Sheila Styron. We wanted an animal behaviorist to talk to us about training and behavior modification. Mr. Steve Appelbaum of "Animal Behavior and Training Modification Associates" gave us a wealth of information on the subject. He told us all that he could not answer any questions concerning guide work, but would share his expertise in the training and behavior realm with pleasure, and pleased we were. He was a delightful speaker. His entire focus was that dogs are first and foremost, dogs, and that we should never forget that. He told us that we can all modify our dogs behavior, but that we can't train our dogs to not be dogs. It was a fun, lighthearted and interesting program. At about 1:15 PM we adjourned the Fall Meeting of GDUC and went on our way to the Saturday afternoon Plenary Session. The third General Session had several interesting topics scheduled. I was much chagrined to arrive at that session too late to hear the legislative report offered by Dan Kysor. I was held up breaking things down and putting them away after our GDUC meeting. I'm positive, however, that his report will be spotlighted in the BC. Next we heard a discussion of the future of DVS by Madelyn Dovano of Visual Voice-Audio Description Services. For DVS, the horizon looks bright. Next we heard a talk about the use of technology to access a wide variety of opportunities by Diana Drews, Executive Director of Sensory Access Foundation. The Saturday session was wrapped up with a presentation by Gil Johnson, Director of AFB-West and Tony Candela of National Program Associate in Employment, AFB. Employment of, or the lack thereof, the visually impaired was discussed. |
|
Sunday: The Fall 2000, Convention of the California Council of the Blind adjourned right around Noon on November 5, 2000. It was an interesting and very busy conference. |
|
Resolution 2000B-5 White Cane Law Whereas, pedestrian safety is a severe problem throughout the state; and Whereas, blind or visually impaired pedestrians are extremely vulnerable to vehicle-pedestrian accidents; and Whereas, this vulnerability has been recognized by the Legislature in the passage of the "so called" White Cane Law, codified in section 21963 of the Vehicle Code; and Whereas, this law gives blind and visually impaired pedestrians the right of way; and Whereas, many vehicle-pedestrian accidents involving blind or visually impaired pedestrians do not result in a citation against the driver for a violation of section 21963 of the Vehicle Code, or any other provision of law; and Whereas, law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies automatically attribute blame for the accident to the blind or visually impaired pedestrian, often without a thorough fact-finding investigation; and Whereas, failure to cite drivers when appropriate threatens the health and degrades and impairs the safety, security, and welfare of all blind or visually impaired Californians; and Whereas, this failure on the part of law enforcement authorities is discriminatory, violates the civil rights of blind and visually impaired pedestrians, and constitutes a dereliction of duty; and Whereas, not withstanding an effort by this organization early in the 1990's to sensitize law enforcement to the need to enforce the white cane law, little evidence exists that any progress has been made in this regard, now, therefore, be it Resolved, by the California Council of the Blind, on this 5th day of November, 2000, in the city of Los Angeles, that this organization, along with the Guide Dog Users of California, on behalf of all blind or visually impaired pedestrians, demand that all law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies enforce, to the fullest extent possible, the White Cane Law and all other laws protecting blind or visually impaired pedestrians, And, be it further Resolved, that the president of this organization send copies of this resolution to the Attorney General and other appropriate entities, And, be it further Resolved, that local chapters of this organization be strongly urged to advocate with local law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies for enforcement of the White Cane Law and other laws protecting blind or visually impaired pedestrians. |
|
On the first day of creation, God created the dog. On the second day, God created man to serve the dog. On the third day, God created all the animals of the earth (especially the horse) to serve as potential food for the dog. On the fourth day, God created honest toil so that man could labor for the good of the dog. On the fifth day, God created the tennis ball so that the dog might or might not retrieve it. On the sixth day, God created veterinary science to keep the dog healthy and the man broke. On the seventh day, God tried to rest, but He had to walk the dog. Contributed by |
|
This is the article, reprinted from the San Diego Tribune, that has started the discussion. DOGS GIVE PEACE OF MIND TO CRIME VICTIMS By Dong-Phuong Nguyen September 17, 2000 Amy Weigel knows what it's like to live in fear-afraid to walk down the short driveway to her car, to mingle in a crowd, to jog around the block. After she was sexually assaulted by a stranger five years ago, her life changed. "It takes a little bit out of everything you do," said Weigel, a 24-year-old liberal studies student at San Diego State University. "School was really hard. It was hard being around large crowds, going out to eat ... little things people take for granted." But Weigel got a big part of her life back earlier this year when she was introduced to a dog named Fedor. The 2-year-old German shepherd accompanies Weigel everywhere - on airplanes, to school, to the grocery store - so he can watch everyone she encounters. And when someone who might be a threat approaches Weigel, Fedor positions his 103-pound body in front of her so he can confront the stranger with growls, barks and unmistakable menace. It's his job. Fedor is at Weigel's side as part of a new San Diego program that matches victims of crimes with large dogs trained to protect them and help them regain a sense of security. The animals are considered service dogs, so they accompany their handlers everywhere, just like canines that assist the blind and people with other disabilities. Service Dogs for Victims of Assault is pioneering the effort in the United States, and it has sent dogs to three other states that want to offer the same service. "I was in pretty bad shape," Weigel said in describing her life before Fedor (pronounced Fay-door). But now, with the large dog by her side, things are different. "Life has changed all for the better," she said. "(Fedor) gives me a sense of self-confidence that I thought was gone, and safety and peace of mind to just be in crowds of people and know that I'm going to be OK." The idea that dogs could assist crime victims was developed by Sherri Goldstein, a licensed and certified hypnotherapist in North Park whose patients deal with such issues as agoraphobia, post-traumatic stress disorder and other problems. A few years ago, Goldstein had finished going through relaxation techniques with a rape victim when the woman leaned down to hug one of the three German shepherds that lounge around Goldstein's office. Goldstein, who has trained German shepherds and who has done canine rescue work for more than 15 years, considers herself somewhat of an expert on the breed. Through tears, the patient told Goldstein that the only place she felt safe was when she was at Goldstein's office, with the dogs. "A light bulb went on," Goldstein said. "My sense of security is largely enhanced by traveling with a large pack of dogs, and they're German shepherds at that. I realized my clients could also enjoy that sense of security if they were to have a companion animal with them." So Goldstein started researching the subject and learned that the American with Disabilities Act covered hidden disabilities, like those her patients suffered from. At the end of 1999, after $3,000 in legal fees and hundreds of hours of research, Service Dogs for Victims of Assault was created. In less than a year, the group has helped 15 women and two men in the San Diego area and has sent dogs to Nevada, Oregon and New Hampshire. The 17 people who have the service dogs were referred to the organization by law enforcement, the District Attorney's Office, psychiatrists and social workers. The people have been diagnosed as suffering from psychological effects of crimes such as assault, stalking and rape. William Stothers, deputy director for the Center for an Accessible Society in San Diego, said programs that carry out the goals of the ADA are of great help. "Where animals are able to be very, very helpful to people and enable people with impairments to lead fuller and more independent lives, that is very valuable," he said. Legally, people with disabilities do not have to identify why they have the dog. Goldstein instructs her clients to say the dogs provide handicap assistance. "By having to detail their reasons just reactivates the trauma," she added. However, not just anyone is given a service dog. The organization does not provide dogs in spousal abuse situations or if a person's psychiatric disorder is too extreme to entrust him or her with a dog. A victim's advocate referred Weigel to the program in March, after she discovered her house had been burglarized. Weigel, of Chula Vista, came home just as the burglars left. Two 13-year-old boys were later arrested and convicted of the crime. But it left Weigel, who had gone through therapy because of the sexual assault years earlier, feeling even more vulnerable. She was soon introduced to Service Dogs for Victims of Assault and given Fedor. As part of the boys' punishment, the court ordered them to pay $700 to Weigel to cover the cost of acquiring and training Fedor. Other victims receive financial assistance through the program's donors. Fedor has become a constant companion to Weigel in the seven months they have been together, even accompanying her to classes at SDSU. During an hour long lecture on geology recently, Fedor sat at Weigel's feet, his head on the floor, but eyes alert. He wore a blue vest instructing people not to pet him and a badge identifying him as a service dog. Weigel poured him bottled water. Fedor is constantly aware of his surroundings, although he rolls over for the occasional belly rub. "He's still in training," Weigel said as she affectionately ran her fingers over his belly during a break between classes. While she sat, Fedor lay at her feet, sometimes with his muzzle flat on the ground. As students scuttled to class, their feet hit inches from Fedor's nose. He did not flinch. He is trained to not be alarmed by noise and bustle around him. But at the sign of a threat, Fedor snaps into action. Weigel and Fedor are training together so Fedor will respond to voice commands. Fedor's protective nature is common among his breed, but more specialized training is needed in order for him to become a service dog. The pair train together once a week, with more lessons ahead. There are seven trainers in San Diego county who teach the dogs for free or at a discount. One of the first people to assist the organization by volunteering her time to train the dogs and create a model for other trainers is Brigitte Shaw, owner of CBS Dog Training based in Alpine. Shaw, who has trained dogs for about 18 years, said that depending on the dog's temperament, it can take four weeks to four months to train a dog for the program. "There is no bite work involved," she said. "The only things we basically want the dog to do is bark but not to bite. You have to turn the dog on and turn the dog off on command." Some of the best breeds for the job are the German shepherds, Doberman pinschers, giant schnauzers, bouviers, Airedales and Rottweilers. All of the dogs in the program are rescued from shelters. The cost for medical checkups, treatment and training can run the group about $800 a dog. Once trained, a canine goes to a sort of halfway house where it waits to be assigned to a handler, someone the dog will live with permanently. When Weigel first got Fedor, her husband left for work one morning and turned right back because he had forgotten something. Weigel was still in bed when he walked through the front door and was stopped by Fedor at the doorway. The dog barked and growled and refused to let him pass until Weigel called him off. Now that Fedor has been in the family for seven months, he's protective of Weigel and her entire family. "He's always my first line of defense," she said. Weigel's experience with Fedor is common. One handler e-mailed Goldstein a letter of thanks for her dog and told of her new companion's protective nature. They went into a store with "larger than life-sized" statues of goblins and wizards up on pedestals. The figures were posed in threatening positions, arms raised and crouched over. "(The dog) did not like that," the woman wrote. "She kept stepping in front of me and alerting each time we came near one. That made me feel safe." The dogs in the program have given their handlers exactly what Goldstein has hoped for-greater normalcy and a greater life experience. And Fedor may be a working dog, but at home he gets spoiled as much as Weigel's other dog, a "training-challenged" Australian shepherd named Ginger. "Fedor is part of the family," Weigel said. "When he comes home, he gets to be a dog, basically." When they are no longer needed for their intended purpose, Goldstein said, "the dog may be able to stay home as a beloved pet and eat bon bons." For more information about acquiring a dog, or to make a donation, call Sherri Goldstein at (619) 280-2833 or write to Service Dogs for Victims of Assault, 2316 32nd St., San Diego 92104. |
|
The following is a letter that Sheila Styron wrote to the Editor in response to the letter above. This letter was not published, and there has been no follow-up.
RESPONSE TO DOGS GIVE PEACE OF MIND As a guide dog handler, I cannot count the number of times I have had to explain to someone that Dorian is a guide dog, not a guard dog. For this reason, I am writing to voice some of my concerns regarding the ideas expressed in the September 17 San Diego Union Tribune article, "Dogs Give Peace Of Mind To Crime Victims." The Americans With Disabilities Act has eliminated some of the inequities faced by persons with disabilities in this country. However, the spirit of this long overdue legislation has been tested and violated much of late. Overly broad interpretations of the provisions for service animals in the ADA have lead to the practice of prescribing their use as remedies for conditions such as agoraphobia and post-traumatic stress. One person even claimed access rights for his service snake on public transportation in the San Diego area. The ADA says that a service animal must be trained to perform a service for a disabled individual which helps to mitigate their disability. What is the snake trained to do? Long before the ADA was passed in 1990, guide dog handlers were working hard to secure access rights through legislation and public education. National and state laws have provided access rights undreamed of 50 years ago. Yet, even with all these laws on the books, at times, I must still persuade restaurant staff and taxi drivers that my guide dog, a well groomed, highly trained and gentle black labrador retriever, is permitted to accompany me. I hear repeated claims that dogs are not allowed as well as frantic requests for me to please leave the dog outside. Consider how frustrating it is to explain existing laws over and over again and the energy and patience required to do this with a smile. Just imagine being told to drive without your glasses when you know you cannot safely do so or trying to find your way around an unfamiliar room in the dark. From time to time, I also must reassure people that my guide dog will not bite them or act toward them in an aggressive manner, as guide dogs are dropped from training programs or retired from active guide work when they exhibit these behaviors. Religious beliefs, cultural biases and fear of animals are some reasons why well-trained guide dog teams are still unjustly denied their legal access rights in the year, 2000. Therefore, a statement like: "When someone who might be a threat approaches Weigel, Fedor positions his 103-pound body in front of her so he can confront the stranger with growls, barks and unmistakable menace," causes me serious concern. These protection dogs, often obtained from shelters and trained for as little as four weeks, are compared to guide dogs who are bred, raised and intensively trained five to six months or longer for their work. Service Dogs For Victims Of Assault are issued to rape victims and other survivors of assault crimes. To those who have suffered such life trauma, these large, protective dogs are welcome companions, but do they perform a service that mitigates a true disability? Even before their training is complete, these so-called working teams are permitted to travel everywhere the law allows, including flying on crowded airplanes and riding in elevators where there may be strangers who appear to be a danger or small children who are behaving in a threatening manner as seen through the eyes |